Being one of the main representatives of the Western-European classical philosophy, Immanuel Kant dealt with the best traditions of the German idealism. A human personality, according to Kant is the highest and absolute value. This question lies in the fight between the undermost and highest abilities of a desire, between the longing to happiness and a good will that is a manifestation of duty. He tried to create the highest form of estimation of the ethical principles that managed morality?
The philosopher I used is Immanuel Kant. He was very practical in his thinking of goodness. A quote of his was "I ought, therefore I can". His view was good anything is under good will. He believed good will was the primary goodness, good in its purest form, and that it couldn't be corrupted.
Good feelings and good intentions and actions can be interpreted in different ways; man can corrupt these things into evil What he's really trying to say is that good will is good in its objective form. Therefore, it defines goodness.
A few examples of forms of goodness that could be corrupt are intelligence, courage, and resolution. These things can be very good, but can be used for evil as well. The title even has "good" in it The question now would be, does the Misfit have good will?
Is what he is doing good, objectively, and purely? He is purging and purifying the world. He is Christ like in many senses. He is purifying the world by purging it of its evil God decided that the human race was too evil to survive, so he flooded it.
God killed, as well as the Misfit. This isn't the same as Christ, though; it just adds to the religious element. Christ's mission was to try and rid the world of evil, and sacrificed for it. The Misfit sacrificed his freedom initially, was "reborn" again by escaping from jail, and become a Christ like figure again The literal differences are obvious; Christ never held anyone at gunpoint, let alone kill old ladies no matter HOW hateful.
But the allusions above illustrate that the Misfit was indeed a Christ-like figure with good intentions; good will.
The Misfit was in a world of evil where he felt it was his mission, as well as his intention and his will, to be the savior of the good people. When it really comes to good will, I believe that the Misfit did have good will and that, in a world such as his, the South, he was not just playing God, but his will was forcing him to be God to judge the "infidels".
I think the best poem I can relate to Kant's philosophy is "Richard Cory". Richard Cory didn't have good will, that was his downfall. You can't tell a whole lot from his personal life from the poem, but you can always assume that he didn't have good will, at least in relation to Kant's philosophy.
Assuming that, we look at his "good" actions, intentions, etc. He was a pillar of society, looked at as the model of goodness. This is exactly the people's mistake. I believe that the people killed Richard Cory by not looking inward for goodness; by saying: This put him on a pedestal, like the hunger artist.
The people killed him by this method; he realized that the people did not have good will because they were looking at him for goodness, and therefore, he could never have good will. The people were looking for an identity, and it was too much for Richard Cory. An aspect of my life, or upcoming life, that I'd relate to Kant's philosophy is the fact that someday, I'd like to be a parent.
God knows that the fact this isn't happening often enough is leading to problems like overpopulation and societal breakdown, but I would want to be a role model to my child ren and teach them everything I know so that eventually, they will be the best possible person I can raise them to be, and then be able to go out on their own and do the same.
There can be many definitions of the word happiness. It can be applied to In one word, this concept exemplifies the American dream. People go to any means by which to obtain the many varied materials and issues that induce pleasures iKant says that an action is morally good if performed not from any inclination, but from duty alone.
This means that all our actions should not be driven by any motive of self-interest or happiness but from the sole motive of duty itself. Kant provides the example of a shopkeeper in order to explain this. Kant says that an action is morally good if performed not from any inclination, but from duty alone.
This means that all our actions should not be driven by any motive of self-interest or happiness but from the sole motive of duty itself. Good Essays words | ( pages) | Preview Duty and Morality in Kant’s Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals - This selection is only the first section of Immanuel Kant’s Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals.
Kant starts off making two distinctions regarding kinds of knowledge, empirical/rational and formal/material. Empirical or experience-based knowledge is contrasted with rational knowledge, which is independent of experience. Kant places good will at the centre of ethics, and in doing so; went beyond anything ever written before.
For Kant, the supreme thing on earth is the development of a good will, and to act from a sense of duty. The good will is the only unconditional good despite all encroachments. Misfortune may render someone incapable of achieving her goals, for instance, but the goodness of her will remains.
Goodness cannot arise from acting on impulse or natural inclination, even if impulse coincides with duty.