The attitudes of people towards war changed during World War One for many reasons.
Download Essay Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.
The two poems "Dulce et Decorum Est" by Wilfred Owen and "The Soldier" by Rupert Brooke. Compare how the poets have used techniques and ideas to convey there attitudes to war. Comparison essay: "Dulce et Decorum Est" and "The Soldier" "Dulce et Decorum Est" by Wilfred Owen and "The Soldier" by Rupert Brooke are two poems about war. Wilfred Owen's "Dulce et Decorum Est" is a powerful antiwar poem which takes place on a battlefield during World War I. Through dramatic use of imagery, metaphors, and diction, he clearly states his theme that war is terrible and horrific. To show how attitudes to the war changed as the Great War progressed I have chosen four poems. “The soldier” by Rupert Brooke, “In Flanders Field” by John McCare and ” Disabled” and “Dulce Et Decorum Est.” both by Wilfred Owen.
The poem itself is bitter and ironic, giving the message that war is unglamorous, and to think that it is something to rejoice in is to disregard those who have died in service. However, Owen finishes his poem by saying that the phrase is a lie and only used to deceive young children desperate for glory.
This gives a shock to the reader, as it turns the title of the poem into an ironic statement, mocking almost. The images in the first four lines, of religious calling, inspired youth, waking with restored strength and refreshed senses, and the swimmer turning away from filthiness perhaps and diving into clean water are images of baptism, which could mean that Brookes sees the war as a chance for a new beginning, perhaps for himself or for the whole world.
His poem takes on the form of a sonnet, with a break between lines eight and nine. This break could symbolise a separation of themes or ideas within the poem, or the time gap from the start of the war to the end of it.
This is not normally the type of imagery associated with soldiers, who are often described as vibrant, energetic and unstoppable in their goal to achieve peace. This message would have come as a shock to those at home, who had very little idea of the hardships of war, suffered only by soldiers who were unable to share their experiences with their friends and relatives simply because they could not find the words in which to put their encounters.
The second stanza is a celebration of how the war will end, either through one side winning, or through the soldiers own death. The account is disturbing in that the description of a man dying is vivid in its simplicity, and the use of the word ecstasy slows down the pace and prolongs the effect of the images.
The third stanza is composed of two lines only, but it is still separated from the rest of the poem, perhaps to symbolise the loneliness of a soldier who has survived an attack, but lost all his friends.
Owen also reveals that he dreams of the ordeal, so his experience is never truly over and keeps haunting him even when he is relatively safe. In the final stanza, Owen invites the reader to share in his experience, of watching a man die a most painful and unnecessarily prolonged death, describing every physical aspect that he observes.
Finally, Owen finishes with a blow to all the patriotic Britons who tell their children Dulce Et Decorum Est Pro Patria Mori, by saying that it is an old lie, used as a blanket to cover up the injustices of war, turning the title of his poem into an ironic statement.
Both poets have differing views on the war, predominantly due to the time at which each poem was written. Brookes was killed before he was able to do his duty to his country, so he died with the impression of war being glamorous event forever branded to his name.
He wrote without any fighting experience, which accounts for the absence of any remorse shown for lost lives, any grievance for lost friends.
In addition, people should be ashamed for disrespecting those who have given their lives by celebrating war and being excited at the prospect of Britain joining in a tempestuous struggle for life, which is seen as one big adventure.
One aspect that both writers share is their gender. Being male, they tend not to concentrate on the way the war affects the women in their poetry, and instead they assert their expectations and experiences of the war.
In the case of Brookes, we can see that he is clearly excited at the prospect of going to war, his hopes high and full of expectations of war being a colourful alternative to everyday life, rather akin to a young boy at the prospect of a holiday or adventure.
Owen on the other hand takes up the role of the cynic, who has lived through the fighting and finds it difficult and disturbing to recount his experiences to us. To conclude, my opinion of both pieces of poetry is that I am able to empathise with each writer in turn, the emotions of the prospect of a war and the excitement of change, the experiences from fighting tirelessly and losing friends to an onslaught of death.
I feel that both poems are typical of their time, but convey messages that people can truly identify with. If you have not fought, that is.
More essays like this:Compare Wilfred Owens “Dulce et decorum est” and Rupert Brooke’s “Peace” Essay Sample. The two poems “peace” and “dulce et decorum est” are two poems about the First World War, but they show two different views of the war.
Peace by Rupert Brooke Essay your attention to a close examination of Rupert Brookes sonnet ‘Peace’ which was inspired by his experience with the Wilfred Owen ():"Anthem for a Doomed Youth" Link to Collected Poems [At Toronto] Wilfred Owen: "Dulce et Decorum Est" Herbert Read (): "The Happy Warrior" kaja-net.comn.
To show how attitudes to the war changed as the Great War progressed I have chosen four poems. “The soldier” by Rupert Brooke, “In Flanders Field” by John McCare and ” Disabled” and “Dulce Et Decorum Est.” both by Wilfred Owen.
Rupert brooks "peace" poem is highly patriotic and displays a positive feeling about the war, Wilfred Owens "dulce et decorum est" highlights a very different view, a view of disgust, a view of the true horrors of the war.
the poem seems re-open some of Owens wounds, revives memories he has from the war, memories that will be with him forever. The language used by Rupert Brooke and Wilfred Owen, for The Soldier and Dulce Et Decorum Est is vastly different from each other, even though both poems were about war.
Wilfred Owen uses language in Dulce Et Decorum Est to give the reader the impression that war is horrible and that dying for one /5(6). Poetry Analysis Essay. Poetry Analysis Paragraph: Dulce et decorum Est In Wilfred Owens’s poem “Dulce et Decorum Est,” the horrific suffering of a soldier submerged in the gruesome reality of war is vividly illustrated through the use of visual and auditory imagery.