In the course of tracking down the sources of unlicensed distribution, they found many things, including the copying of his column to alt. One of the people I was hanging around with online back then was Gordy Thompson, who managed internet services at the New York Times.
I will try to do this today with the hope to be able to shed some light on a rather bizarre attack which will nevertheless have profound consequences.
To believe that it would require you to find the following sequence logical: Then, the US declares that overthrowing Assad is not a priority anymore up to here this is all factual and true. Then, Assad decides to use weapons he does not have.
He decides to bomb a location with no military value, but with lots of kids and cameras. Then, when the Russians demand a full investigation, the Americans strike as fast as they can before this idea gets any support.
And now the Americans are probing a possible Russian role in this so-called attack. Frankly, if you believe any of that, you should immediately stop reading and go back to watching TV. For the rest of us, there are three options: This option requires you to believe in coincidences.
Unless, the US fed bad intelligence to the Syrians and got them to bomb a location where the US knew that toxic gas was stored. What is evident is that the Syrians did not drop chemical weapons from their aircraft and that no chemical gas was ever stored at the al-Shayrat airbase.
There is no footage showing any munitions or containers which would have delivered the toxic gas. As for US and other radar recordings, all they can show is that an aircraft was in the sky, its heading, altitude and speed.
There is no way to distinguish a chemical munition or a chemical attack by means of radar. Whatever option you chose, the Syrian government is obviously and self-evidently innocent of the accusation of having used chemical weapons.
This is most likely a false flag attack. Also, and just for the record, the US had been considering exactly such a false flag attack in the past. You can read everything about this plan here and here.
American and Russian sources both agree on the following facts: The US did not consult with the Russians on a political level, but through military channels the US gave Russia 2 hours advance warning.
At this point the accounts begin to differ. The Americans say that all missiles hit their targets. The Russians say that only 23 cruise missiles hit the airfield.
Here I think that it is indisputable that the Americans are lying and the Russians are saying the truth: Furthermore, the Syrian Air Force resumed its operations within 24 hours. That is a fact. It is also indisputable that there were no chemical munitions at this base as nobody, neither the Syrians nor the Russian reporters, had to wear any protective gear.
The missiles used in the attack, the Tomahawk, can use any combination of three guidance systems: GPS, inertial navigation and terrain mapping. There is no evidence and even no reports that the Russians shot even a single air-defense missile. While the Tomahawk cruise missile was developed in the s, there is no reason to believe that the missiles used had exceeded their shelf live and there is even evidence that they were built in The Tomahawk is known to be accurate and reliable.
There is absolutely no basis to suspect that over half of the missiles fired simply spontaneously malfunctioned. I therefore see only two possible explanations for what happened to the 36 missing cruise missiles: That would make it possible for Trump to appear tough while not inflicting the kind of damage which would truly wreck his plans to collaborate with Russia.
The Russians could not legally shoot down the US missiles.
Furthermore, it is incorrect to assume that these cruise missiles flew a direct course from the Mediterranean to their target thereby almost overflying the Russian radar positions.Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Article Index. The Journal of Special Operations medicine peer-reviewed article index displays all of our articles listed in alphabetical order.
Gilgamesh - King of Uruk, the strongest of men, and the personification of all human virtues.A brave warrior, fair judge, and ambitious builder, Gilgamesh surrounds the city of Uruk with magnificent walls and erects its glorious ziggurats, or temple towers.
Get free homework help on William Golding's Lord of the Flies: book summary, chapter summary and analysis, quotes, essays, and character analysis courtesy of CliffsNotes. In Lord of the Flies, British schoolboys are stranded on a tropical island.
How Good Are Those Young-Earth Arguments? A Close Look at Dr. Hovind's List of Young-Earth Arguments and Other Claims by Dave E. Matson. Isabel Allende's notable short story "And of Clay Are We Created" is written in the magical realism style and deals with themes of memory, the past and death.
The themes are often expressed with the use of plot devices and images surrounding the concept of burial. The latest US cruise missile attack on the Syrian airbase is an extremely important event in so many ways that it is important to examine it in some detail.